<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plums</title>
	<link>http://mindofwinter.org/2004/06/24/plums/</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing poems and poetry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Boyd</title>
		<link>http://mindofwinter.org/2004/06/24/plums/#comment-42</link>
		<author>Patrick Boyd</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mindofwinter.org/2004/06/24/plums/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Arighty that poem had a major major impression upon me- the images hit- and the senses- and this was like the week or so of some TS Elliot exerpts so - the difference ya know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arighty that poem had a major major impression upon me- the images hit- and the senses- and this was like the week or so of some TS Elliot exerpts so - the difference ya know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://mindofwinter.org/2004/06/24/plums/#comment-40</link>
		<author>Jon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mindofwinter.org/2004/06/24/plums/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>How a poem can be a plum:

First and foremost, if you actually ate the poem to test my comparison, I apologize.  I tried it as well and found it to be tough and a little bitter.

That aside, I'd like to clarify what is plummy about this poem.  The easiest comparison is size, both being small; however, that would make WCW's book of poetry a collection of plums.  So, a couple of more items:  the poem is sweet and guilty (guilt tastes sour).  Joking aside, plums (and, generally, sour tasting treats) are unpleasant in a pleasant way.

I would also say that the poem reads like eating a plum.  The first two stanzas are large bites while the last is comprised of many small nibbles.

Finally, the most obvious comparison is that they are both purple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How a poem can be a plum:</p>
<p>First and foremost, if you actually ate the poem to test my comparison, I apologize.  I tried it as well and found it to be tough and a little bitter.</p>
<p>That aside, I&#8217;d like to clarify what is plummy about this poem.  The easiest comparison is size, both being small; however, that would make WCW&#8217;s book of poetry a collection of plums.  So, a couple of more items:  the poem is sweet and guilty (guilt tastes sour).  Joking aside, plums (and, generally, sour tasting treats) are unpleasant in a pleasant way.</p>
<p>I would also say that the poem reads like eating a plum.  The first two stanzas are large bites while the last is comprised of many small nibbles.</p>
<p>Finally, the most obvious comparison is that they are both purple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
